<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="2312">
<titleInfo>
<title>Writing Arguments:</title>
<subTitle>A Rhetoric with Readings</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Ramage, John</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Bean, John</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Johnson, June</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">USA</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>Pearson</publisher>
<dateIssued>2014</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition>10th</edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>576p</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>For courses in Argument and Research. This version of Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings has been updated the reflect the 8th edition of the MLA Handbook (April 2016) *
The most thorough theoretical foundation available Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings, 10/e integrates four different approaches to argument: the enthymeme as a logical structure, the classical concepts of logos, pathos, and ethos, the Toulmin system, and stasis theory. Focusing on argument as dialogue in search of solutions instead of a pro-con debate with winners and losers, it is consistently praised for teaching the critical-thinking skills needed for writing arguments. Major assignment chapters each focus on one or two classical stases (e.g. definition, resemblance, causal, evaluation, and policy). Each concept is immediately reinforced with discussion prompts, and each chapter ends with multiple comprehensive writing assignments.</note>
<subject authority=""><topic>Rhetoric</topic></subject>
<classification>808</classification><identifier type="isbn">9780134586519</identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Podomoro University Digital Library</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>808 Ram w</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">2017.08.2662</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>808 Ram w</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>writing_arguments.jpg.jpg</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>2312</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-08-09 10:22:37</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-08-09 10:23:38</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>